The game of chess is EASILY solved if you look at diminishing the number of playing pieces on the board instead of wasting time and computative power attempting to both capture and defend the kings. From a dialogical perspective this would be like reducing the weapons or argumentative dynamics involved in ANY disagreement so that the two principles, the two kings, can sit down person-to-person and speak from the essential or true self rather than from the ego or the confused emotionally reactive mind (weaponry).

No one can win an argument, ever. If two or more people UNDERSTAND each other then there is mutual understanding which in the case of a chess game would be a draw with ONLY the two kings left on the board.

[please also reference the Anything Is Possible PROOF explanation]