"The word integral means comprehensive, inclusive,
non-marginalizing, embracing. Integral approaches to any field attempt
to be exactly that: to include as many perspectives, styles, and
methodologies as possible within a coherent view of the topic. In a
certain sense, integral approaches are "meta-paradigms," or ways to draw
together an already existing number of separate paradigms into an
interrelated network of approaches that are mutually enriching."1 -- Ken Wilber
The world has never been so complex as it is right now -- it is mind
boggling and at times emotionally overwhelming. Not to mention, the
world only seems to get more complex and cacophonous as we confront the
major problems of our day: extreme religious fundamentalism,
environmental degradation, failing education systems, existential
alienation, and volatile financial markets. Never have there been so
many disciplines and worldviews to consider and consult in addressing
these issues: a cornucopia of perspectives. But without a way of
linking, leveraging, correlating, and aligning these perspectives, their
contribution to the problems we face are largely lost or compromised.
We are now part of a global community and we need a framework -- global in
vision yet also anchored in the minutiae of our daily lives -- that can
hold the variety of valid perspectives that have something to offer our
individual efforts and collective solution building.
In 1977 American philosopher Ken Wilber published his first book, The Spectrum of Consciousness.
This groundbreaking book integrated the major schools of psychology
along a continuum of increasing complexity, with different schools
focused on various levels within that spectrum. Over the next 30 years
he continued with this integrative impulse, writing books in areas such
as cultural anthropology, philosophy, sociology of religion, physics,
healthcare, environmental studies, science and religion, and
postmodernism. To date, Wilber has published over two dozen books and in
the process has created integral theory.2 Wilber's
books have been translated into more than 24 languages, which gives you
an idea as to the global reach and utility of integral theory.3
Since its inception by Wilber, integral theory has become one of the
foremost approaches within the larger fields of integral studies and
meta-theory.4 This prominent role is in large part the result
of the wide range of applications that integral theory has proven
itself efficacious in as well as the work of many scholar-practitioners
who have and are contributing to the further development of integral
Integral theory weaves together the significant insights from all the
major human disciplines of knowledge, including the natural and social
sciences as well as the arts and humanities. As a result of its
comprehensive nature, integral theory is being used in over 35 distinct
academic and professional fields such as art, healthcare, organizational
management, ecology, congregational ministry, economics, psychotherapy,
law, and feminism.5 In addition, integral theory has been
used to develop an approach to personal transformation and integration
called Integral Life Practice (ILP). The ILP framework allows
individuals to systematically explore and develop multiple aspects of
themselves such as their physical body, emotional intelligence,
cognitive awareness, interpersonal relationships, and spiritual wisdom.
Because integral theory systematically includes more of reality and
interrelates it more thoroughly than any other current approach to
assessment and solution building, it has the potential to be more
successful in dealing with the complex problems we face in the 21st
Integral theory provides individuals and organizations with a powerful
framework that is suitable to virtually any context and can be used at
any scale. Why? Because it organizes all existing approaches to and
disciplines of analysis and action, and it allows a practitioner to
select the most relevant and important tools, techniques, and insights.
Consequently, integral theory is being used successfully in a wide range
of contexts such as the intimate setting of one-on-one psychotherapy as
well as in the United Nations "Leadership for Results" program, which
is a global response to HIV/AIDS used in over 30 countries. Towards the
end of this article I provide additional examples of integral theory in
action to illustrate the variety of contexts in which people are finding
the integral framework useful.
Wilber first began to use the word "integral" to refer to his approach after the publication of his seminal book Sex, Ecology, Spirituality
in 1995. It was in this book that he introduced the quadrant model,
which has since become iconic of his work in general and integral theory
in particular. Wilber's quadrant model is often referred to as the AQAL model, with AQAL (pronounced ah-qwal)
standing for all quadrants, all levels, all lines, all states, and all
types. These five elements signify some of the most basic repeating
patterns of reality. Thus, by including all of these patterns you "cover
the bases" well, ensuring that no major part of any solution is left
out or neglected. Each of these five elements can be used to "look at"
reality and at the same time they represent the basic aspects of your
own awareness in this and every moment. In this overview I will walk you
through the essential features of each of these elements and provide
examples of how they are used in various contexts, why they are useful
for an integral practitioner, and how to identify these elements in your
own awareness right now. By the end of this tour, you will have a solid
grasp of one of the most versatile and dynamic approaches to
integrating insights from multiple disciplines. So let us begin with the
foundation of the AQAL model: the quadrants.
All Quadrants: The Basic Dimension-Perspectives
According to integral theory, there are at least four irreducible perspectives
(subjective, intersubjective, objective, and interobjective) that must
be consulted when attempting to fully understand any issue or aspect of
reality. Thus, the quadrants express the simple recognition that
everything can be viewed from two fundamental distinctions: 1) an inside
and an outside perspective and 2) from a singular and plural
perspective. A quick example can help illustrate this: imagine trying to
understand the components of a successful meeting at work. You would
want draw on psychological insights and cultural beliefs (the insides of
individuals and groups) as well as behavioral observations and
organizational dynamics (the outsides of individuals and groups) to
fully appreciate what is involved in conducting worthwhile meetings.
These four quadrants also represent dimensions of reality.
These dimensions are actual aspects of the world that are always present
in each moment. For instance, all individuals (including animals) have
some form of subjective experience and intentionality, or interiors, as well as various observable behaviors and physiological components, or exteriors.
In addition, individuals are never just alone but are members of groups
or collectives. The interiors of collectives are known generally as
intersubjective cultural realities whereas their exteriors are known as
ecological and social systems, which are characterized by interobjective
dynamics. These four dimensions are represented by four basic pronouns:
"I", "we", "it", and "its." Each pronoun represents one of the domains
in the quadrant model: "I" represents the Upper Left (UL), "We"
represents the Lower Left (LL), "It" represents the Upper Right (UR),
and "Its" represents the Lower Right (LR) (see Fig. 1).
Figure 1. The four quadrants.
As both of the Right-Hand quadrants (UR and LR) are characterized by
objectivity, the four quadrants are also referred to as the three value
spheres of subjectivity (UL), intersubjectivity (LL), and objectivity
(UR and LR). These three domains of reality are discernable in all major
languages through pronouns that represent first-, second-, and
third-person perspectives and are referred to by Wilber as "the Big
Three:" I, We, and It/s. These three spheres can also be characterized
as aesthetics, morals, and science or consciousness, culture, and nature
(see Fig. 2).
Figure 2. The Big Three.
Integral theory insists that you cannot understand one of these
realities (any of the quadrants or the Big Three) through the lens of
any of the others. For example, viewing subjective psychological
realities primarily through an objective empirical lens distorts much of
what is valuable about those psychological dynamics. In fact, the
irreducibility of these three spheres has been recognized throughout the
history of Western philosophy, from Plato's True, Good, and Beautiful
to Immanuel Kant's famous three critiques of pure reason, judgment, and
practical reason to Jürgen Habermas' validity claims of truth,
rightness, and truthfulness (Fig. 2). Wilber is a staunch advocate of
avoiding reducing one of these spheres into the others. In particular,
he cautions against what he calls flatland: the attempt to
reduce interiors to their exterior correlates (i.e., collapsing
subjective and intersubjective realities into their objective aspects).
This is often seen in systems approaches to the natural world, which
represent consciousness through diagrams of feedback loops and in the
process leave out the texture and felt-sense of first- and second-person
One of the reasons integral theory is so illuminating and useful is it
embraces the complexity of reality in ways few other frameworks or
models do. In contrast to approaches that explicitly or inadvertently
reduce one quadrant to another, integral theory understands each
quadrant as simultaneously arising. In order to illustrate the
simultaneity of all quadrants I will provide a simple example with
Figure 1 in mind. Let us say I decide I need to buy some flowers for the
garden and I have the thought, "I want to go to the nursery." The
integral framework demonstrates that this thought and its associated
action (e.g., driving to the garden store and purchasing roses) has at
least four dimensions, none of which can be separated because they
co-arise (or tetra-mesh) and inform each other. First, there is
the individual thought and how I experience it (e.g., mentally
calculating travel time, the experience of joy in shopping, or the
financial anxiety over how I will pay for my purchase). These
experiences are informed by psychological structures and somatic
feelings associated with the UL quadrant. At the same time, there is the
unique combination of neuronal activity, brain chemistry, and bodily
states that accompany this thought, as well as any behavior that occurs
(e.g., putting on a coat, getting in the car). These behaviors are
associated with various activities of our brain and physiological
activity of the body, which are associated with the UR quadrant.
Likewise, there are ecological, economic, political, and social systems
that supply the nursery with items to sell, determine the price of
flowers, and so on. These systems are interconnected through global
markets, national laws, and the ecologies associated with the LR
quadrant. There is also a cultural context that determines whether I
associate "nursery" with an open-air market, a big shopping mall, or a
small stall in an alley, as well as determining the various meanings and
culturally appropriate interactions that occur between people at the
nursery. These cultural aspects are associated with worldviews in the LL
Thus to have a full understanding of and appreciation for the
occurrence of the thought, "I'm going to the nursery," one cannot
explain it fully through just the terms of either psychology (UL), or neurobiology and physiology (UR), or social and economic dynamics (LR), or
cultural meaning (LL). For the most complete view, as we will see, one
should take into consideration all of these domains (and their
respective levels of complexity). Why is this practical? Well if we
tried to summarize this simple situation by leaving out one or more
perspectives, a fundamental aspect of the integral whole would be lost
and our ability to understand it and address it would be compromised.
Thus, integral practitioners often use the quadrants as their first move
to scan a situation or issue and bring multiple perspectives to bear on
the inquiry or exploration at hand.
Quadrants and Quadrivia
As noted above, there are at least two ways to depict and use the quadrant model: as dimensions or as perspectives. The first, a quadratic
approach, depicts an individual situated in the center of the quadrants
(see Fig. 3). The arrows point from the individual toward the various
realities that he can perceive as a result of his own embodied
awareness. Through his use of different aspects of his own awareness, or
through formal methods based on these dimensions of awareness, he is
able to encounter these different realities in a direct and knowable
fashion. In brief, he has direct access to experiential, behavioral,
cultural, and social/systemic aspects of reality because these are
actual dimensions of his own existence. This is useful to him because it
empowers him to notice, acknowledge, and interact more effectively with
his world. In short, the more of these "channels" he has open the more
information he will be obtaining about what is happening around him and
he will be able to feel and act in ways that are timely and insightful.
Notice right now how you are engaged in all three perspectives:
first-person (e.g., noticing your own thoughts as you read this),
second-person (e.g., reading my words and interpreting what I am trying
to convey), and third-person (e.g., sitting there aware of the light,
sounds, and air temperature around you). Do you see how you are always
experiencing the world from all four quadrants -- right here, right now? It
is that simple.
Figure 3. The four quadrants of an individual.
Another way to represent the quadrant model is as a quadrivia. Quadrivia refers to four ways of seeing (quadrivium
is singular). In this approach the different perspectives associated
with each quadrant are directed at a particular reality, which is placed
in the center of the diagram. Let us say hundreds of fish are dying in a
lake. The death of these fish become the focus or object of
investigation and analysis, with expertise from each of the quadratic
domains evaluating the situation. The arrows pointing toward the center
indicate the methodologies that different experts (associated with each
quadrant) use to study the dying fish. In an integral approach these
include exploring the emotions, self-identities, and beliefs of
individuals who live on the lake through psychological and experiential
inquiry; exploring the empirical, chemical, and biological factors
contributing to the dying fish through behavioral and physiological
analyses; exploring the philosophical, ethical, and religious viewpoints
of the community around the lake through cultural and worldview
investigations; and exploring the environmental, political, educational,
legal, and economic factors of the situation through ecological and
social assessments (see Fig. 4).
Figure 4. The four quadrivia of a lake.
In sum, the quadrants highlight four irreducible dimensions that all
individuals have and quadrivia refer to the four fundamental
perspectives that can be taken on any phenomena. In either case, the
four quadrants or quadrivia are co-nascent -- literally "they are born
together" and are mutually implicated in one another. In other words,
they co-arise and tetra-mesh. This understanding is useful because it
honors the complexity of reality in a way that allows the practitioner
to address problems in a more skillful and nuanced way. Furthermore, the
quadrants represent the native ways in which we experience reality in
each moment and quadrivia represent the most common ways we can and
often do look at reality to understand it.
All Levels: Depth and Complexity
Within each quadrant there are levels of development. Within the interior, Left-Hand quadrants there are levels of depth and within the exterior, Right-Hand quadrants there are levels of complexity.
The levels within each quadrant are best understood as probability
waves that represent the dynamic nature of reality and the ways
different realities show up under certain conditions. Additionally, each
quadrant's levels are correlated with levels in the other quadrants.
For example, a goal-driven executive (UL) who has high blood pressure
(UR) will most likely be found in a scientific-rational culture or
subculture (LL), which usually occurs in industrial corporate
organizations (LR). In this example, all of these aspects of the
situation are occurring at the same level of complexity and depth within
their respective quadrant and are therefore correlated at level five in
Figure 5. The inclusion of levels is important because they allow us to
appreciate and better interface with the realities associated with each
quadrant. Each quadrant serves as a map of different terrains of
reality. The levels within each quadrant represent the topographical
contour-lines of that terrain. This helps us to identify the unique
features of that particular landscape, which enables us to travel
through it more successfully and enjoy the amazing vistas along the way.
Figure 5. Some levels in the four quadrants.
Levels or waves in each quadrant demonstrate holarchy,
which is a kind of hierarchy wherein each new level transcends the
limits of the previous levels but includes the essential aspects of
those same levels. Thus, each wave inherits the wave of the past and
adds a new level of organization or capacity. As a result, each level of
complexity or depth is both a part of a larger structure and a whole
structure in and of itself. In the subjective realm, sensations are
transcended and included in impulses, which are transcended and included
in emotions, which are transcended and included in symbols, which are
transcended and included in concepts. Likewise, in the intersubjective
realm this dynamic occurs from archaic interpretations to magical
explanations, to mythical stories, to rational views, to integral
understandings. In the objective realm this movement occurs from atoms
to molecules, to cells, to tissues, to organs. And in the interobjective
realm this occurs in the movement from galaxies to planets, to
ecosystems, to families, to villages (see Fig. 5 for another
presentation of what is transcended and included in each quadrant).6
Regardless of where different researchers might draw the line between
levels, a general pattern of evolution or development occurs in each
quadrant: depth enfolds (i.e., folds in on itself), complexity increases
(i.e., expands out and includes more).
Levels of development are often represented by arrows bisecting each
quadrant (as in Fig. 5). Integral theory uses the notion of general altitude
as a content-free way of comparing and contrasting development across
different domains either within or between quadrants. This is akin to
using a thermometer to gauge temperature in a variety of settings -- a
centigrade thermometer works at the equator just as well as in the
arctic, and as a result allows us to compare the weather in those
distant places in a meaningful way. Integral theory uses the colors of
the rainbow to represent each distinct level (e.g., red, amber, orange,
green, teal, turquoise). This spectrum of color also represents the
general movement of a widening identity: from "me" (egocentric) to "my
group" (ethnocentric) to "my country" (sociocentric) to "all of us"
(worldcentric) to "all beings" (planetcentric) to finally "all of
reality" (Kosmoscentric) (see Fig. 6). This general trajectory of
expanding awareness has correlates in each quadrant. Integral theory
also uses the image of concentric circles (often overlaid on the
quadrants) to highlight the nested quality of levels transcending and
including each other (see Fig. 6).
Figure 6. Widening identity (left) and the nested quality of levels as they transcend and include each other (right).
The inclusion of levels in an integral approach is valuable because it
recognizes the many potential layers of development within any domain of
reality. Practitioners gain valuable traction by aiming their efforts
at the appropriate scale and thereby finding the key leverage point -- like
an acupuncturist hitting the right spot for optimal health and
well-being. This conserves energy and resources and focuses efforts
optimally. For example, imagine working with a group of teachers on
developing a new mission statement for their educational program.
Clearly, working with the realities of the LL quadrant will be
paramount -- articulating shared vision and meaning, exploring via dialogue
various phrases that might be used in the document, and so on. But you
are going to be more effective in facilitating this collaborative
process if you have a sense of the levels of shared meaning that are
operative in this group and what they are trying to communicate in their
statement. Are they operating primarily out of modern values,
postmodern values, or a combination of both? Knowing this will greatly
inform your capacity to serve their effort. Thus, it often is not enough
to just be aware of the quadrants -- you must also work with the depth and
complexity within each domain.
Figure 7. A psychograph.
Figure 8. A sociograph.
Just as we can locate each quadrant in our own awareness through the
use of first-, second-, and third-person perspectives, so too can we
locate levels of depth and complexity in our direct experience. To
illustrate this, all you have to do is notice how you tend to go through
your day with a predictable amount of depth and complexity. For
example, on good days you feel more depth and can handle more complexity
and on other days you seem to be tripping over everything (diminished
capacity to handle complexity) and find yourself getting irritated at
the smallest thing (diminished capacity to experience depth). Thus, you
often go through your day primarily expressing one altitude or level
more than others, although you have a felt sense of what it is like to
be "up leveling your game" (a level above) or "misfiring with each step"
(a level below).
All Lines: Various Developmental Capacities
Lines of development are another way to describe the distinct
capacities that develop through levels in each aspect of reality as
represented by the quadrants. So if levels are contour-lines on a hiking
map for reality, then lines of development represent the various trails
you can take to transverse the vast wilderness of human potential. For
example, in the individual-interior quadrant of experience, the lines
that develop include, but are not limited to, cognitive, emotional,
interpersonal, and moral capacities. These capacities are often thought
of as the multiple intelligences that each person has. The idea being
that each of us is more developed in some areas than others. Integral
theory uses a psychograph to depict an individual's unique
assortment of development in various individual lines (Fig.
Similarly, a sociograph is used to represent the various lines
of development within a family, group, culture, or society (Fig. 8).
The kinds of lines found in cultures include things like kinesthetic
capacities, interpersonal maturity (e.g., absence of slaves, women's
rights, civil liberties), artistic expression (e.g., forms of music,
government funding for the arts), cognitive or technological capacities,
physical longevity (e.g., healthcare systems, diet), and polyphasic
maturity. Polyphasic refers to a culture's general access to
different states of consciousness. For example, many indigenous cultures
embrace access to and cultivation of different kinds of states of
awareness while rational Western societies tend to emphasize rational
waking consciousness at the exclusion of other modes of experiencing
reality. An integral practitioner can use lines as a diagnostic tool to
ensure these aspects of individuals or groups are acknowledged and
effectively addressed. Below is an overview of the kinds of lines that
can be included in an integral assessment.
Each line within a quadrant has correlates in the other quadrants. For
example, as the cognitive line develops in the UL quadrant there are
corresponding behavioral and neurophysiological developments in the UR
quadrant, corresponding intersubjective capacities in the LL quadrant,
and grammatical structures in the LR quadrant. In fact, there are a
variety of lines in each quadrant. Above I listed some of the common
lines associated with the UL. Lines associated with the UR include the
developmental pathways of things like skeletal-muscular growth,
brainwave patterns, the neuronal system, and other organic structures of
the body. In the LL we find lines such as the sequence of worldviews
and cultural values, various intersubjective dynamics, religious and
philosophical viewpoints, and linguistic meaning. Lastly, in the LR
specific lines include how ecosystems develop as well as evolutionary
pathways of adaption, geopolitical structures, and forces of production
What distinguishes a line from other patterns such as states or types
is that a line demonstrates sequential development with increasing
levels of complexity or depth that transcend and include the previous
level. In other words, there has to be an identifiable series of stages
that unfold in a particular order and any given stage cannot be skipped.
For example, within the LR line of forces of production we see a
societal path starting with foraging (e.g., hunting and gathering)
giving way to horticulture (e.g., using a hoe) giving way to agrarian
methods (e.g., using a plow) and so forth -- each new development is
dependent on what came before and is in part a response to the limits of
that previous level.
Figure 9. Some lines in the four quadrants.
The lines element especially demonstrates how integral theory includes
the contributions of many existing fields and organizes them in a useful
way. Also, lines are important to integral practitioners because they
identify distinct aspects of each quadrant that demonstrate development
and evolution. By being aware of the specific dynamics of growth and the
typical trajectory of such transformation, a practitioner can better
support and make use of these streams of development. Consequently,
integral assessments will often identify which lines are strong and
which ones are in need of attention, leveraging the more developed ones
to assist in addressing the limits of the less developed ones. Knowing
the level of development within various lines provides integral
practitioners with valuable information about the realities of a given
situation and helps the practitioner align those realities for optimal
As with the other elements of the AQAL model, we do not have to go far
to discover lines in our immediate awareness. Just recall a recent
moment where you felt stretched or challenged, such as giving difficult
feedback to a colleague or trying some new task that required a high
level of hand-eye coordination. Now bring into your awareness an area
where you are often more capable than your colleagues, such as seeing
multiple perspectives at the same time on some complex situation or an
ability to emotionally connect to your friends and describe -- better than
they can -- what they are feeling. Drawing on personal examples of areas
where you are less or more developed than people around you shows we all
have a unique combination of lines at various levels of development. In
fact, rarely a day goes by that we are not aware of the truth of this
within ourselves and in our interactions with others. Besides, life
would be significantly less interesting if everyone was equal in depth
and complexity in most areas.
All States: Temporary Expressions
In addition to levels and lines there are also various kinds of states
associated with each quadrant. States are temporary occurrences of
aspects of reality (lasting anywhere from a few seconds to days, and in
some cases even months or years). They also tend to be incompatible with
each other. For example, you cannot be drunk and sober at the same
time, a town cannot experience a blizzard and a heat wave on the same
day. Below are a few examples of the kinds of states associated with
each quadrant (Fig. 10). Thus, to continue with our hiking metaphor,
states can be likened to the momentary glimpses of nature you get as you
walk along the trail. For example, how a breathtaking vista keeps
"popping" through the trees as you hike or a bird that grabs your
attention as it makes a unique click-clack-clack sound and then
is gone. Before you know it, these attention-grabbing experiences
recede into the background and you are back on the trail pounding dirt
with your hiking boots.
Figure 10. Some states in the four quadrants.
In the UL quadrant there are phenomenal states such as elevated and depressed emotional states, insights, intuitions, and moment-to-moment feeling states. There are also the natural states of
waking, dreaming, and deep sleep as well as the Witness (the pure
observing awareness of all the other states) and even non-duality, where
the Witness dissolves into everything that is witnessed. Various
religious traditions provide us with rich and sophisticated descriptions
of these states. In addition, there are altered states
of consciousness that can be either externally induced (e.g., through
the use of drugs, trauma, or a near-death experience) or internally
induced or trained (e.g., meditative, holotropic, flow, lucid dreaming,
peak experiences). When states are trained they often unfold and even
stabilize in a sequential pattern, moving from gross to subtle to very
subtle forms of experience and are thus referred to as state-stages. This is contrasted with the structure-stages
of psychological development (discussed above in the levels and lines
sections). Both states and structures of consciousness can occur in
stages, with state-stages expanding horizontally and structure-stages
In the UR quadrant there are brain states (alpha, beta, theta, and delta) and hormonal states associated with the cycles of estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone. There are also behavioral states
such as crying and smiling. In fact, states are often used to describe
the ways natural phenomena morph from one thing into another (e.g., H2O
turning from solid ice to liquid water to gaseous steam).
In the LL quadrant we find group states such as mob mentality or mass hysteria, crowd excitement, and group-think. There are also intersubjective states
such as the somatic states that occur between infants and their mothers
or shared resonance between two people in an engaging dialogue. Similar
to altered states in individuals, there are religious states within groups such as shared ecstasy and bliss or a communal experience of the divine.
In the LR quadrant there are weather states (heat waves,
blizzard, torrential rain) and fluctuating room temperature indoors. Our
financial markets go through a variety of economic states such
as bear and bull markets, bubbles, recessions, and so forth. We also
talk about old-growth forests representing a climax community -- a
steady-state of equilibrium. This notion of equilibrium is illustrative
of various ecological states such as entropy (increased disorder) or eutrophy (being well-nourished).
The inclusion of states is useful for practitioners because our
realities both internally and externally are always shifting -- all kinds
of state changes occur throughout our day within ourselves and our
environments. Including states allows us to understand many of the ways
these shifts occur and why. This in turns allows us to be attentive to
these shifts and place them in service of our efforts instead of being
knocked off center by their occurrence. For example, when we are aware
of the many states a group of people go through in a full-day workshop,
we can design our curriculum to honor these shifting "moods" and to even
make use of them to facilitate learning.
As far as locating this element in our direct awareness, we only have
to notice how many different emotions we experience in a short period of
time. Most of us are aware of how quickly we can shift from feeling "on
cloud nine" due to some really good news to getting frustrated because
some jerk just cut us off on the freeway to feeling anxiety about having
to speak in front of a group at work to getting hungry and wondering
what are you going to have for dinner. . . And to think that all of
these states can occur within five minutes.
All Types: Various Patterns
Types are the variety of consistent styles that arise in various
domains and occur irrespective of developmental levels. Types can
overlap or be incongruous. Drawing again on the hiking metaphor, we can
think of types as the different kinds of hikers there are -- those who like
to go fast, those who meander, those who take lots of pictures, those
who like to sing, and so on. These kinds of people tend to hike like
this regardless of what kinds of trails they are on or terrains they are
moving through; they bring their unique style wherever they go. As with
the other elements, types have expressions in all four quadrants (see
Figure 11. Some types in the four quadrants.
In the UL quadrant there are personality types. There are
numerous systems that map the number of different personalities,
including Keirsey (4 types), Enneagram (9 types), and Myers-Briggs (16
types). In this quadrant there are also the gender types of
masculine and feminine. In general, individuals have access to both
masculine and feminine qualities and thus tend to have a unique
combination of traits associated with each type. In the UR quadrant
there are blood types (A, B, AB, O) and William Sheldon's well-known body types (ectomorph, endomorph, mesomorph). In the LR quadrant there are ecological biome types (e.g., steppe, tundra, islands) and governmental regime types (e.g., communist, democracy, dictatorship, monarchy, republic). In the LL quadrant there are types of religious systems (e.g., monotheism, polytheism, pantheism) and different types of kinship systems (e.g., Eskimo, Hawaiian, Iroquois, Omaha, Sudanese).
The usefulness of types has been acknowledged in multiple contexts,
such as designing nutritional diets or building effective work teams.
Being aware of types allows integral practitioners to adjust their craft
to accommodate some of the most common and consistent styles associated
with various contexts. Types are very stable and resilient
patterns -- after all, they are horizontal structures or type-structures
(in contrast to vertical structure-stages). So by becoming more aware
of them and their role in whatever you are attempting to do, you are
more able to infuse sustainability into your efforts by linking to
existing enduring patterns.
Within our own awareness, types are most obvious when we consider
masculine and feminine expressions. We each have access to both and know
what it feels like to be solid and agentic -- for example, going for the
goal (one aspect of masculine) or enjoying the game for the game's sake
(one aspect of feminine). We can even shift between these styles,
although some of us are more identified with one side of this spectrum
than others. You likely can think of men or women you consider more
masculine or more feminine and what it feels like to be around them -- do
you find yourself being more masculine or feminine as a way of meeting
them in that mode or by way of providing a contrast with their type?
Another area where we have a direct experience of types is in terms of
personality qualities like introversion and extroversion. Thus, we are
often aware of type dynamics in our experience of ourselves and others.
All Zones: Different Ways of Knowing
In addition to the five elements of integral theory, which comprise the
basic foundation of the AQAL model, there is an another more advanced
aspect that is important to mention. This aspect is less of a new
element and more of a complexification of the first one (the quadrants).
Each of the perspectives associated with the four quadrants can be
studied through two major methodological families, namely from either
the inside (i.e., a first-person perspective) or the outside (i.e., a
third-person perspective). This results in eight distinct zones of human inquiry and research. These eight zones comprise what integral theory calls integral methodological pluralism (IMP),
which includes such approaches as phenomenology (an exploration of
first-person subjective realities), ethnomethodology (an exploration of
second-person intersubjective realities), and empiricism (an exploration
of third-person empirical realities). Figure 12 includes all eight
zones and their respective labels. IMP represents one of the most
pragmatic and inclusive theoretical formulations of any integral or
meta-theoretical approach. It gives the integral practitioner assurance
that they are using tried and true methods of investigation that human
ingenuity has produced over the last 2000 years.
Integral methodological pluralism operates according to three principles: inclusion (consult multiple perspectives and methods impartially), enfoldment (prioritize the importance of findings generated from these perspectives), and enactment (recognize
that phenomenon are disclosed to subjects through their activity of
knowing it). As a result of these commitments, integral theory
emphasizes the dynamic quality of realities as being enacted through a
subject using a particular method to study an object. That object can be
a first-, second-, or third-person reality. For example, we can study
first-person psychological realities as an object of investigation just
as easily as we can study third-person biological realities.
Figure 12. Eight methodological zones.
Because integral theory acknowledges and includes all the major
insights from valid forms of research, it emphasizes the importance of
including all zones in its efforts to understand anything in a
comprehensive way. It uses the IMP framework as a way to marshal,
coordinate, and assess pertinent perspectives and their research
findings. To return to our integral hiker, IMP provides her with
multiple ways of interacting with and knowing the landscape she is
traveling through. Her compass, binoculars, book of edible plants, early
morning meditations, and previous wildlife encounters all provide her
with different ways of knowing the wilderness in ways that are
meaningful and valuable to her as a hiker and nature lover.
Among the many important perspectives on reality, there are schools of
thought that specialize in using the methods, practices, and techniques
associated with each zone. Consequently, in addition to the five
elements presented above, an integral approach must include all eight
zones or it risks leaving out important aspects of reality that have a
bearing on effective solutions to the problems facing our communities
and our planet. In other words, the more of reality we acknowledge and
include, the more sustainable our solutions will become, precisely
because a project will respond more effectively to the complexity of
that reality. We cannot exclude major dimensions of reality and expect
comprehensive, sustainable results. Eventually those realities that have
been excluded will demand recognition and incorporation as the design
falters and is abandoned for more nuanced and comprehensive strategies.
Hence the need for an integral approach.
An integral practitioner is constantly combining first-, second-, and
third-person methods, practices, and techniques in an effort to research
the many essential aspects of a given situation. Performing such
integral research, either through informal or formal means, the
practitioner is engaged in integral methodological pluralism. This kind
of integral mixed methods orientation is extremely valuable because it
allows practitioners to often discover surprising relationships between
first-, second-, and third-person realities that later become essential
links in their designs and solutions. Through IMP, integral
practitioners are often able to identify valuable connections between
distinct realities that have yet to be identified or leveraged in
previous efforts. Thus, equipped with the eight major forms of knowledge
acquisition developed by humanity, the integral practitioner is well
positioned to know the complexity and depth of reality and to place that
insight into service for self, culture, and nature. The reason an
integral practitioner can use this wide assortment of formal methods in
the first place is that they are actively engaged in using all of these
methods informally in their own embodied awareness. In fact, each major
methodological family (e.g., empiricism or hermeneutics) is simply a
formalized version of something we do naturally all the time. For
example, our ability to take a third-person perspective on the world
around us (e.g., looking at the flowers growing along the sidewalk) is
the basis for empiricism and our ability to take a second-person
perspective with our friends (e.g., talking to them about why they want
to quit their job) is the basis for hermeneutics. Consequently, the
eight zones of IMP is simply a reminder of the many ways we know
ourselves, others, and the world around us. The integral framework
allows us to coordinate these multiple ways of knowing and place them
into orchestrated action in the world.
Integral Theory in Action
As you can see by now, an all-quadrants, all-levels, all-lines, all-states, all-types, and
all-zones approach is pretty comprehensive. Of course, you do not have
to use all of these distinctions all the time. In fact, even using two
of these elements can make your approach to analysis or solution
building more integral than many others. However, having all five of
them in your "toolbox" allows you more capacity to respond to the
complexity of our world and provides a place for including the essential
aspects of any given situation. In addition, it helps us understand the
relationships between the various facets of reality that we come
across. In fact, this is what sets integral theory apart from all other
integrative and comprehensive approaches to solution generation and
change facilitation. Currently there is no meta-framework as inclusive
and theoretically sound as integral theory, which is what has made it
such a useful approach in so many contexts. The AQAL model is a dynamic
framework that does more than just cover the basic elements of
reality -- it interrelates them in a way that allows us to ensure that we
are leveraging our efforts in an functional, aesthetic, accurate, and
just way. In other words, an integral approach allows for true, good,
and beautiful solutions to the major problems we face as we travel into
the 21st century.
In fact, the AQAL model is multi-variant and can be understood in a number of ways. AQAL is a map
because it is a series of third-person symbols and abstractions that
can guide a person through the contours of their own awareness, as well
as through some of the most important aspects of any situation. It is a framework
because it creates a mental space where one can organize and index
their and others' current activities in a clear and coherent manner. It
is a theory because it offers an explanation for how the most time-tested methodologies and data they generate can fit together. It is a practice
because it is not just a theory about inclusion but an actual series of
practices of inclusion. It involves the meta-paradigm of correlating
humanity's most fundamental methodologies of knowledge generation. AQAL
can also be practiced in a more personal setting, which results in what
is called integral life practice (ILP). It is a set of perspectives because it brings together first-, second-, and third-person perspectives. It is a catalyst
because it psychoactively scans your entire body-mind and activates or
"lights up" any potentials (quadrant, level, line, state, or type) that
are presently not fully being used. Lastly, it is a matrix
because it combines all quadrants, levels, lines, states, and types in a
way that generates a space of potential out of which more of reality
can manifest and be accounted for than any other model has ever
included. In short, the AQAL model can be summarized as a third-person
map of reality, a second-person framework for working within and across
disciplines, and a first-person practice for engaging the development of
our own embodied awareness. All three of these aspects of the AQAL
model -- map, framework, and practice -- contribute to an increased experience
of intimacy with reality by expanding and deepening our contact with
more dimensions of ourselves, our communities, and our
Now that you have a general overview of the AQAL model, I can highlight
how these approaches are using integral principles successfully in the
field: in the classroom, in the board room, in the political arena, and
in home offices. In addition to disciplinary uses of the AQAL model
(e.g., integral ecology or integral coaching), there have also been
systematic efforts to advance integral theory as a specific field of
meta-studies. Four main efforts currently contribute to this goal: 1)
the peer-reviewed Journal of Integral Theory and Practice,
which has published over 100 academic articles and case studies to date;
2) John F. Kennedy University's Department of Integral Theory, with its
online master of arts program and one-year certificate in integral
theory (this program is doing much to train the next wave of integral
leadership in application of the AQAL model); 3) the Integral Research
Center, which is supporting graduate level mixed methods research around
the world that is informed by integral theory; and 4) the international
biennial Integral Theory Conference, which recently brought together
500 academics and practitioners from all over the globe who are applying
and refining integral theory.7 This systemic effort is
important because it allows discipline-specific practitioners (e.g.,
integral psychotherapists or integral educators) to know the model is
sound, it educates integral practitioners to understand the model as a
whole (independent of any discipline-specific application), and it
creates a community of discourse and inquiry to further the development
of the model in a way that invites critical thought and demonstrated
In recent years a number of books have been published applying integral
theory to various areas such as urban design (Marilyn Hamilton's Integral City), psychological assessment (Andre Marquis's The Integral Intake), organizational dynamics (Mark Edward's Organizational Transformation for Sustainability), health (Elliott Dacher's Integral Health), ecology and environmental studies (my and Michael Zimmerman's Integral Ecology), psychopharmacology (Elliott Ingersoll and Carl Rank's Psychopharmacology for Helping Professionals), business (Daryl Paulson's Competitive Business, Caring Business), and international community development (Gail Hochachka's Developing Sustainability, Developing the Self).8
To date, the fields that have produced the largest amount of
theoretical and applied material using integral theory include
psychotherapy and psychology, education, mixed methods research, ecology
and sustainability, international development, future studies,
business, and organizational management.9 Following are short descriptions of a number of current examples of integral theory in action.
The Integral Research Center (IRC) is in the process of designing and
launching an ambitious longitudinal study using methods from all eight
zones of integral methodological pluralism to assess the transformative
effects of integral education at John F. Kennedy University. The IRC is
working with Theo Dawson of Developmental Testing Service and Susanne
Cook-Greuter of Cook-Greuter and Associates to help with the research
design, which includes the Lectical Assessment System (LAS) and the
Sentence Completion Test (SCT). This study aims to discover, "In what
ways do students transform within the online master of arts program in
integral theory?" Do they, over the course of three years of coursework,
demonstrate vertical stage development (e.g., exiting one level and
beginning to stabilize the next one) and/or horizontal development
(e.g., increased access to emotional content). If so, what aspects are
developing? The results of this ongoing study will be used to improve
the developmental potential of the curriculum, making it even more
conducive to psychological transformation and growth.10
Integral International Development
One Sky-Canadian Institute for Sustainable Living in partnership with Drishti-Centre
for Integral Action recently received a $500,000 grant from the
Canadian International Development Agency for a three-year leadership
development project entitled, "Integral Applications to Sustainability
in the Niger Delta." Building on previous work it had done in Nigeria,
One Sky was aware of the value of interventions associated with the
Right-Hand quadrants that focused on "development, financial management,
improved communications, and policy influence." While recognizing the
essential role such efforts play, One Sky became increasingly aware of
how these efforts could not be sustained without supportive
interventions from the Left-Hand quadrants that focused on "personal
leadership, self-awareness, moral intelligence, and interpersonal
skills." Consequently, their project will work with 30 young Nigerians
from nearly a dozen organizations in the Cross River region of the Niger
Delta on environmental and economic sustainability. "The project
essentially involves engaging a personal development process (I), held
in place with learning communities and a new social discourse (We), and
enacted in breakthrough initiatives in their home organizations
(It/Its)."11 In addition, this program will be evaluated through a pre/post assessment based on the principles of integral research.
Next Step Integral, an international non-profit, was established in
2003 by Stephan Martineau. Soon he joined forces with Lisa Farr, the
director of a local watershed association, to begin the arduous task of
establishing an integral approach to a community forest project in the
Slocan Valley of British Columbia, Canada. This goal was particularly
daunting given the historical tensions over a 35-year period between
various worldviews within and outside of the community (e.g., loggers,
miners, farmers, environmentalists, First Nations individuals, artists,
practitioners of multiple religious faiths, government workers, and a
multinational corporation). Also, there had already been nine
failed attempts by the B.C. government to establish a workable solution
to the divisions within the community between stakeholders connected to
the forest. The guiding principles of their initiative included:
recognizing and honoring the diverse perspectives about the forest of
Slocan Valley residents; recognizing that these perspectives were
informed by lenses associated with each of the quadrants (e.g.,
behavioral, cultural, psychological, historical); and recognizing that
any viable long-term solution would have to integrate the many
conflicting views within the community. In addition, Martineau
identified a number of "main capacities" explicitly grounded in the AQAL
model but used implicitly to support their initiative: holding and
inhabiting multiple perspectives; an awareness of and an ability to work
with the multiple lines of individuals; a commitment to personal growth
and shadow work; creating shared motivations; balancing empathy,
engagement, and impartiality; and cultivating qualities, attitudes, and
capacities that supported mutual understanding.
On January 14, 2007, Next Step Integral submitted an application for a
Community Forest Agreement to allow the local community to manage 35,000
acres of contested forest. In July of that same year their proposal was
approved! Thus three years of negotiations and grassroots work guided
by the AQAL model resulted in the creation of a large-scale integral
forestry cooperative -- the first of its kind in the world. This community
forest project has support of an impressive 95% of the inhabitants in
the valley. Aptly named the Slocan Integral Forestry Cooperative
(SIFCo), this project is a true testimony to the power of the integral
model -- even as an implicit guide -- in working with diverse perspectives to
achieve a common goal that other approaches failed to manifest. Now that
SIFCo has been granted tenure over the land, the coming years shall be
an important testing ground and source of clarification of the tenets of
integral ecology in general and of integral forestry in particular.12
Integral Coaching Canada (ICC), an Ottawa-based company, has developed
an entire school and methodology for professional coaching based on the
AQAL model. Over the past 10 years ICC has emerged as one of the premier
schools in the world for professional coaching. They have a rigorous
methodology that combines embodied perspective taking, presence, and
powerful conceptual distinctions. Coaches use all five elements
discussed above to support their own personal growth and to work with
their client's development. Typically it takes an individual two years
to complete the certification process and become an Integral Coach®.13
ICC has a strong reputation for demanding a great deal from their
coaches-in-training, which includes each trainee committing to an
integral life practice that includes meditation, body work, journaling,
and reading. They are the only coaching school I am aware of that
incorporates developmental psychology (e.g., Robert Kegan's
subject-object theory) as the spine of their methodology.14
This alone gives ICC a trremendous advantage over other schools because
their approach is built on extensive psychological research about how
and why humans transform and integrate new capacities. In fact, ICC's
application of the integral framework is one of if not the most
sophisticated uses of integral principles in any context or field.
The State of the World Forum (SOWF) was established in 1995 by Jim
Garrison with Mikhail Gorbachev. SOWF began as a series of annual
conferences that convened hundreds of international leaders (ranging
from community organizers, Nobel Laureates, social activists, Heads of
State, and business leaders) to explore key issues facing the globe.
These gatherings established a Global Leadership Network committed to
the guiding principle: "Transforming conversations that matter into
actions that make a difference." Over the years, SOWF sponsored a
variety of gatherings and "strategic initiatives" that resulted in a
number of projects and non-profit organizations.15 In 2008,
SOWF set its sights on the borderless problem of climate change and the
global transition towards a "green economy," and in November of 2009
will initiate a 10-year cycle of international annual gatherings. SOWF
has adopted the AQAL model as the organizing framework for each event.
Consequently, integral theory will be used for designing each conference
and for guiding the development of policy recommendations to political
leaders at all levels of government and civic responsibility. These
gatherings will take place in different countries around the globe and
build a coalition of multi-stake holders committed to developing
innovative policy and effective action for confronting climate change
and serving to guide the emergence of new sources of energy. Now this is
integral theory in action -- working across the globe with diverse leadership to address humanity's first planetary crisis.
The above examples are wonderfully far-ranging in their focus and
scale. This variety of integral theory in action speaks directly to the
flexibility and coherence of its theoretical foundation: the AQAL model.
By acknowledging the multifaceted nature of complex issues and
problems, integral theory creates a space for multiple perspectives to
contribute to the discovery of viable solutions. In our ever-evolving
universe, integral theory issues to each of us a clarion call to strive
towards inhabiting multiple perspectives -- especially those that stand in
contrast to our own habits of thinking and feeling. Only through
developing such a worldcentric perspective can we adequately achieve the
mutual understanding so desperately needed on a planet fragmented by
conflicting worldviews and approaches. Practitioners of integral theory
are committed to honoring and including the multidimensionality of
reality as well as cultivating their own capacity for worldcentrism. It
is this dual commitment of comprehensive acceptance and
perspective-taking that allows the individuals and organizations in the
above examples to be so successful in their respective integral
endeavors -- each one of them serving as an exemplar of what a more
integral world looks and feels like. The world is an amazing,
mysterious, and complex place. Integral theory's all-inclusive framework
is particularly well-suited for honoring the world in all its
complexity and depth as well as shining a light on the path each of us
can take to make a contribution and tackle the looming issues that will
confront us in the 21st century.
I would like to thank Vipassana Esbjörn-Hargens, Lynwood Lord, Jordan
Luftig, John Scheunhage, and David Zeitler for helpful comments that
strengthened the quality of this overview.
- From Ken Wilber's "Foreword" in Frank Visser's book, Ken Wilber: Thought as Passion (2003), pp.xii-xiii.
- A complete listing of Ken Wilber's work can be found in Appendix 2 of Brad Reynolds' book, Embracing Reality: The Integral Vision of Ken Wilber (2004). Most of this material can be found in Wilber's Collected Works.
- Frank Visser reports that 22 of Ken Wilber's books have been
translated into over 25 languages, thus making Wilber the most
translated academic author in the United States. Visser reports: "Up
till now his books have been translated into German, Dutch, French,
Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Russian, Czech, Hungarian, Turkish,
Bulgarian, Latvian, Estonian, Slovenian, Slovakian, Serbian, Greek,
Hindi, Chinese (China and Taiwan), Korean, Swazi, Japanese, Polish,
Danish, Swedish, and Latvian. In addition to these, some illegal
editions have appeared in African and Indian dialects." For a chart of
all these translations, see www.integralworld.net/translations.html.
- There is an important difference between integral studies and
integral theory. Integral studies is the broader category and includes
integral thinkers such as Jean Gebser, Sri Aurobindo, Ken Wilber, and
Ervin Laszlo. In contrast, integral theory is a subset of integral
studies, which focuses primarily on Ken Wilber's work and is committed
to the critique, application, and theoretical development of the AQAL
model. The field of meta-theory includes the work of individuals like
Roy Bahskar and George Ritzer.
- See the Journal of Integral Theory and Practice for articles in these and many other disciplines.
- Note that the examples given for each quadrant are not correlated
between themselves; they only represent single examples for each
- For further information on these efforts, consult their respective websites:
- Journal of Integral Theory and Practice (www.integraljournal.org);
- John F. Kennedy University's Department of Integral Theory
- The Integral Research Center
- the international biennial Integral Theory Conference (www.integraltheoryconference.org).
- In addition to these titles, it is worth mentioning that in 2009 two
anthologies will be published by SUNY press, one on integral education
and one on integral theory.
- See the resource page at www.integralresearchcenter.org for listings of all the published material in these areas.
- A full description of this project can be found at www.integralresearchcenter.org.
- All quotes in this paragraph come from www.onesky.ca, which can be visited for more information on this project.
- Visit http://www.sifco.ca for more information on this project.
- Integral Coach is a registered trademark in Canada and owned by
Integral Coaching Canada, Inc. For information on their trainings see
their website: www.integralcoachingcanada.com.
- For an extensive overview and introduction to Integral Coaching Canada's approach, see issue 4(1) of the Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, which is devoted entirely to their work.
- Visit www.truthisnotenough.com for more information.
- Bhaskar, Roy. (2002). meta-Reality: The philosophy of meta-Reality, Volume 1 a philosophy for the present. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Dacher, Elliott S. (2006). Integral health: The path to human flourishing. Laguna Beach, CA: Basic Health Publications.
- Edwards, Mark. (2009). Organizational transformation for sustainability: An integral metatheory. New York, NY: Routledge.
Esbjörn-Hargens, Sean, & Zimmerman, Michael E. (2009). Integral ecology: Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world. New York, NY: Random House/Integral Books.
- Esbjörn-Hargens, S., Reams, J., & Gunnlauson, O. (Eds.). (in press). Integral education: Exploring multiple perspectives in the classroom. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
- Esbjörn-Hargens, S. (Ed.). (in press). Integral theory in action: Applied, theoretical, and critical perspectives on the AQAL model. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
- Hamilton, Marilyn. (2008). Integral city: Evolutionary intelligences for the human hive. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society Publishers.
- Hochachka, Gail. (2005). Developing sustainability, developing the self: An integral approach to international and community development. The Polis Project on Ecological Governance. Victoria, British Columbia: University of Victoria, Canada.
- Ingersoll, R. Elliott, & Rank, Carl F. (2006). Psychopharmacology for helping professionals: An integral exploration. Toronto, Canada: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
- Marineau, Stephan. (2007). Humanity, forest ecology, and the future in a British Columbia valley: A case study. Integral Review, 4, 26-43.
- Marquis, Andre. (2007). The integral intake: A guide to comprehensive idiographic assessment in integral psychotherapy. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Paulson, Daryl. (2002). Competitive business, caring business: An integral business perspective for the 21st century. New York, NY: Paraview Press.
- Reynolds, Brad. (2004). Embracing reality: The integral vision of Ken Wilber. New York, NY: Tarcher.
- Ritzer, George. (2001). Explorations in social theory: From metatheorizing to rationalization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Visser, Frank. (2003). Ken Wilber: Thought as passion. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
- Wilber, Ken. (1995). Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
- Wilber, Ken. (1999-2000). The collected works of Ken Wilber. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
- Wilber, Ken. (2006). Integral methodological pluralism. In: Integral Spirituality: A Startling New Role for Religion in the Modern and Postmodern World. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
- Wilber, Ken. (2008). The Integral Vision. Boston, MA: Shambhala.
- Wilber, Ken, Patten, Terry, Leonard, Adam, & Morelli, Marco. (2008). Integral life practice: A 21st-century blueprint for physical health, emotional balance, mental clarity, and spiritual awakening. New York, NY: Random House/Integral Books.
SEAN ESBJÖRN-HARGENS, Ph.D., is associate professor and founding chair
of the Department of Integral Theory at John F. Kennedy University in
Pleasant Hill, California. A leading scholar-practitioner in integral
theory, he is the founder and executive editor of the Journal of Integral Theory and Practice and founding director of the Integral Research Center. He has published extensively on the applications of the integral model in a variety of areas. He is a practitioner within Tibetan Buddhism and the Diamond Approach and lives in Sebastopol, California, on five acres of redwoods with his wife and two daughters. Sean is an integral coach and consultant through Rhizome Designs (www.rhizomedesigns.org).